The GRE Analytical Writing section often causes anxiety for even the most prepared test-takers. But with the right approach, tools, and examples, you can master the GRE essays and target a top score.
In this guide, we'll explore proven strategies, high-scoring sample essays (for both Issue and Argument tasks), and actionable tips to help you maximize your AWA score.
Whether you're just beginning your prep or aiming to boost your score from 4.0 to 6.0, this guide will equip you with the tools you need to succeed. All examples and strategies are based on the latest GRE criteria and resources recommended by EverTutor, your trusted partner in GRE success.
The GRE Analytical Writing section evaluates your ability to think critically, communicate complex ideas clearly, and support arguments with logical reasoning. It includes two separately timed tasks:
Each task must be completed in 30 minutes, testing both your analytical thinking and your ability to write quickly and coherently.
Learn More From The Official ETS Source Here.
Your essays are scored holistically by trained graders and a computer program. They are rated on a scale of 0 to 6 (in half-point increments), and the two essay scores are averaged for your final AWA score.
A solid structure is the foundation of a high-scoring GRE essay. Following a consistent outline not only ensures clarity for the reader but also helps you stay organized under time pressure.
Learn More From Official GRE Source here.
Prompt: "The best way to prepare young people for leadership is by instilling cooperation, not competition."
Sample Essay:
In today’s rapidly evolving world, leadership is more than directing others — it is about inspiring collaboration, embracing diversity, and motivating teams toward shared goals. While competition can foster drive and determination, instilling cooperation in young people is ultimately the superior way to prepare them for future leadership roles in government, industry, or any other field.
First and foremost, effective leadership depends on collaboration. No modern leader operates in a vacuum. Consider the example of Abraham Lincoln, who, during the U.S. Civil War, famously appointed political rivals to his cabinet. His “team of rivals” worked together through compromise, respect, and shared purpose — a testament to the power of cooperation. Lincoln's inclusive leadership style helped preserve the Union and reshape the future of the nation. Had he relied solely on competitive instincts, this outcome may not have been possible.
Moreover, in corporate environments, leaders who foster cooperation create high-performing teams. Companies like Google and Apple have flourished not because of cutthroat internal competition, but because they emphasize innovation through shared learning and collaboration. In such workplaces, leaders are expected to nurture talent, align people toward a mission, and resolve conflicts — all of which demand strong cooperative skills. Competition, when unchecked, can lead to toxicity and undermine morale, making long-term leadership unsustainable.
Some argue that competition motivates individuals to excel and builds resilience. While this may be true to some extent, it is also a natural human tendency that emerges without being taught. Cooperation, on the other hand, often needs to be intentionally cultivated. Children are naturally inclined to compete — in sports, in school, and even in family settings. However, teaching them to listen, compromise, and work with others lays the groundwork for emotional intelligence, conflict resolution, and ethical decision-making — all essential leadership traits.
In conclusion, while competition can offer short-term gains, it is cooperation that builds the skills necessary for enduring leadership. By encouraging collaboration from an early age, we equip future leaders to navigate complexity, foster inclusive environments, and lead with empathy. In the boardroom, the courtroom, or the classroom, it is cooperation — not competition — that truly shapes leaders who drive positive change.
Prompt: "The following appeared in a memo from a marketing director at a food distribution company: 'In order to increase our market share and profits, we should reduce the price of our organic produce. Sales of similar products in our competitor’s stores have doubled after they implemented a price reduction strategy.'"
Sample Essay:
The recommendation to reduce prices of organic produce in order to increase market share and profits appears compelling at first glance. However, upon closer inspection, the argument is built on a series of assumptions that are not substantiated by evidence. Without addressing these assumptions, the conclusion remains unconvincing.
First, the argument assumes that what worked for a competitor will automatically yield the same results for this company. While sales at the competitor’s store may have doubled, the causes of this success are unclear. The memo does not provide any details about the competitor’s customer base, store locations, marketing efforts, or quality of goods. It is entirely possible that the competitor benefited from other concurrent promotions, a strong brand reputation, or improvements in supply chain logistics — factors that are not addressed in the memo.
Second, the argument presumes that a price reduction will lead to increased profits. This may not necessarily be the case. While lower prices can drive volume, they can also reduce profit margins. If the cost of producing or sourcing the organic produce is high, the company may not be able to sustain profitability after reducing prices. Moreover, if the price reduction fails to generate sufficient new demand, the company could incur losses instead of gains.
Third, the argument fails to consider the preferences and behaviors of the company’s own customers. The marketing director provides no data about whether current or prospective customers are price-sensitive, or whether other factors — such as product quality, variety, or sustainability practices — influence purchasing decisions. If customers already value the brand for its premium quality, a price cut could even harm the brand’s perception and reduce loyalty.
Additionally, the argument does not explore alternative strategies. For instance, the company could consider targeted promotions, loyalty programs, or partnerships with local farms to increase appeal without broadly slashing prices. Without comparing the relative effectiveness of these alternatives, the recommendation to reduce prices appears premature.
In conclusion, while lowering prices may seem like an intuitive way to boost market share, the marketing director’s argument lacks critical data and analysis. Before acting on this recommendation, the company should investigate the root causes of the competitor’s success, analyze customer preferences, and model the financial impact of a price reduction. Only with this information can the company make an informed and strategic decision.
Writing a high-scoring GRE essay is as much about avoiding common pitfalls as it is about showcasing strengths. Here are some mistakes that can significantly lower your score—and how to steer clear of them:
A vague or missing thesis statement can confuse the reader and make your essay seem directionless. Always clearly state your position in the introduction so your argument has a strong foundation.
Generalized or hypothetical examples fail to demonstrate deep understanding. Instead, use specific, concrete illustrations from history, science, current events, or personal experience. EverTutor’s “Review a GRE Question” feature can help you learn how to build stronger examples by uploading real prompts for analysis.
Especially in the Issue Task, not acknowledging opposing views can make your argument appear one-sided. Demonstrating that you understand and can refute alternative perspectives shows analytical depth and maturity.
Avoid restating the same point in different words. Each paragraph should introduce a new idea or build upon the last one. Use EverTutor’s AI-powered essay feedback to detect redundancy and enhance content clarity.
Using big words doesn’t always equate to better writing. If used incorrectly, they can confuse readers and lower your credibility. EverTutor’s Vocab Path is a powerful tool to build vocabulary meaningfully—using mnemonics, contextual usage, recall training, and personalized learning based on your memory patterns.
Practicing for the GRE Analytical Writing section requires a strategic, consistent approach that mirrors actual exam conditions. Here's how to prepare effectively:
The GRE Analytical Writing section is designed to test how well you can reason and communicate complex ideas. It's not about writing like a novelist—it’s about making your argument clear, structured, and supported.
With high-quality practice, a clear essay structure, and expert tools from EverTutor, achieving a top AWA score is well within your reach.
Start preparing the smart way. Try EverTutor's GRE Toolkit today and transform your writing under timed conditions.
The Issue essay requires you to express your opinion on a general topic, while the Argument essay asks you to critique someone else’s reasoning without giving your own stance.
A score of 4.5 or above is competitive for most graduate programs.
Aim for 400–500 words of well-structured content.
You’ll write two essays—one Analyze an Issue and one Analyze an Argument task, each within 30 minutes.
✅ 1000+ Practice Questions with Step -by-Step AI Walkthroughs.
✅ Vocabulary Trainer for the most essential GRE words.
✅ 24/7 Real-Time Doubt Solving with an AI Tutor.
✅ 5 Full-Length GRE Mock Tests with instant AWA scoring.